Canadian Wildlife Federation
WILD Programs
WILD Connections
WILD Workshops
WILD Resources
WILD Facilitators
Newsletter
Northern Gannet
Shop and Save Wildlife Store
 
Canadian Wild Education Canadian Wild Education
CWF Home
 
Welcome
Wild Education
français about us contact us what's new site map
WILD Programs

print this page

printer
friendly

Fish Ways Activities

 

Designer Fishes

SUMMARY

Students will try to design the most efficient fish for moving in flowing water by testing models in a stream of air. In meeting this challenge, students will investigate how the shape of a fish and the size and placement of its fins are related to drag and stability.

OBJECTIVES

Students will be able to:

  1. identify the relative efficiency of various fish shapes in moving through water; and

  2. determine the most stable arrangement, and function, of fish fins.

LESSON INFORMATION

Curriculum Link: (7SSM), (8SMM), (8SLS)
Setting: science lab classroom
Duration: minimum of two hours
Key Terms: drag, fins (caudal, dorsal, pectoral, pelvic, ventral), friction, streamlining, turbulence

TEACHER BACKGROUND

Friction is the force that resists the motion of one surface relative to another with which it is in contact. Turbulence arises when particles of a fluid move in irregular paths. However smooth a surface looks to the eye, it has many microscopic irregularities - humps and crests - that restrict the easy flow of water over it and increase turbulence. Drag is the combined effect of friction and turbulence acting on an object. The greater the drag, the slower the shape will be able to move through a fluid.

Fins are the locomotory appendages of aquatic vertebrates. A fish's complement of fins typically includes: one or more dorsal and ventral fins whose function are balance; a caudal fin, or tail, the main propulsive organ; a pair of pectoral fins attached to the pectoral (shoulder) girdle and pelvic fins attached to the pelvic (hip) girdle, both of which are used in steering.

Many fishes have adapted to a non-flowing situation, so that their shapes are most efficient for hovering or feeding on the lake bottom. This lesson tests only for efficiency in flowing water and hence seeks to identify the best shape for fishes living in moving water or needing speed to feed or travel.

For this lesson, the most efficient shape will be identified as one that can be pushed along a ruler the least distance by a stream of air. From this observation, students should be able to infer that the most efficient fish for flowing water is the most streamlined - i.e., the one with the least drag.

Using a Plasticine sphere of the same mass as that given to the students, try out the activity a few times to determine the best distance for the vacuum outflow or hair dryer to be positioned from the Plasticine shape (this will depend upon the strength of the stream of air the vacuum cleaner produces). Use this standardized distance for all the students' tests. Allow students the opportunity for a good deal of trial and error as they will need to check the efficiency of a variety of shapes and fin placements.

MATERIALS

Plasticine (pieces of about 100 g); string; rulers; blocks of wood (2"x4" or 2"x 6"); vacuum cleaners or hair dryers; cardboard (shoebox type); scissors; retort stands; clamps

PROCEDURE

  1. Help students focus on the relationship between body shape and adaptation of a species by discussing the following questions.
  • How might the shape of a fish help it survive in a shallow, vegetated habitat?
  • How might the shape of a fish help it survive as a bottom feeder?
  • How might the shape of a fish help it survive in a large, deep lake where it is both a predator of smaller fishes and prey to larger fishes?
  • How might the shape of a fish help it move easily through the strong current of a swiftly- flowing stream?
  1. Have each student or group make three Plasticine shapes with the least amount of drag possible.

  2. Have students test each of their shapes in the stream of air generated by a vacuum cleaner or hair dryer, as follows:

    1. Suspend the shape to be tested on a string from a clamp on a retort stand between the wooden block and the ruler. Make sure that the front edge of the shape is just alongside the 0 mm mark of the ruler.
    2. Position the vacuum outflow or hair dryer at the predetermined distance from the edge of the ruler.
    3. Turn on the vacuum and measure the maxi- mum distance (in mm) travelled by the anterior (front) tip of the Plasticine shape along the ruler; record this distance.
    4. Note the stability of the shape in the stream of air and record it. You might use a scale from 0 to 5, where 0 represents a shape that spins uncontrollably and 5 a shape that is completely steady and unwavering.

  3. Have students cut cardboard fins of various sizes and shapes and insert up to five of these into the Plasticine shapes they found to have the least drag.

  4. Have students repeat the vacuum hose test with various types and placements of fins and record the results.

  5. When all the students or groups have found arrangements that they consider to be as stable as possible, have all the fishes in the class compete in the vacuum test to see which is the most efficient model.

EVALUATION

Have students examine the "Fish of Ontario" information cards and make a Plasticine body shaped like one of its fish, such as pumpkinseed, yellow perch, northern pike or white sucker, with appropriate fins. After they have tested such a fish for drag, ask students the following questions.

    • How did your results compare with results of previous shapes you made?
    • How do your results compare with results from other class members using the same shape?
    • Is this fish suited for slow or fast moving water?

EXTENSIONS

  1. A trip to a local stream could follow the classroom lesson to test the efficiency of the Plasticine fish in slow-moving water. Have students suspend their fishes from a metre stick placed above the water and observe the behaviour of the various models.

  2. Have students study fishing lures and note how the design features of the lure affect its movement through the water. Different kinds of lures, such as plugs and spoons, could be compared. Ask students how the lures' movement is similar to that of fishes. Many lures are designed to resemble injured fishes by moving in an erratic or unstable fashion. Students might make lures from old spoons or wood.

 

News Flash

Search for classroom activities and outdoor projects in this Web site according to life science themes described in the Common Framework of Science Learning Outcomes and/or WILD Education programs.

Search by curriculum
Search by program

 
Keyword search

Curriculum Fit

View documents showing connections between WILD Education programs and the science curriculum in your region.
Click

 


home | français | about us | contact us | what's new | site map
WILD Programs | WILD Connections | WILD Workshops |  WILD Resources | WILD Facilitators

Copyright © 2006-2009 Canadian Wildlife Federation